
|
CATEGORY |
EXCELLENT |
GOOD |
SATISFACTORY |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT |
|
Lab Time and Internet Usage |
Used lab time wisely and stayed on task. Did not go to any unauthorized web sites. |
Mostly used time wisely and did not go to any
unauthorized web sites. |
Used some of the time wisely but did not go to any
unauthorized web sites. |
Did not use time wisely or went to unauthorized web
sites. |
|
Peer Review Attitude |
Is not publicly critical of the project and offers
meaningful suggestions for improvement. |
Is not often publicly critical of the project and
offers meaningful suggestions. |
Are often times publicly critical or does not make
meaningful suggestions for improvement.
Usually had a positive attitude. |
Is mostly publicly critical, does not make
meaningful suggestions for improvement or does not cooperate with
others. Does not have a positive
attitude. |
|
Sentences and Paragraphs |
Sentences and paragraphs are complete. Topics of paragraphs are clear. Paragraphs are of varied structure. |
All paragraphs are complete and well constructed. |
Most of the paragraphs are well constructed but
there are a few fragments or run-on sentences. |
Paragraphs are in need of work. There are several sentence fragments or run
on sentences. |
|
Ideas and persuasiveness |
Ideas were clearly expressed and the reader was left
believing that the queen was indeed a great ruler. |
Ideas were pretty clearly expressed but the
organization could have been better.
Reader was left believing that the queen was a great ruler. |
Ideas were some what organized. The reader was left with the feeling the
queen was a great ruler. |
Ideas were not clearly organized. It was difficult to understand and the
reader did not gain a feeling that the queen was a great ruler. |
|
Paragraph Construction |
All paragraphs include an introductory sentence,
explanations or details. |
Most paragraphs include introductory sentence,
explanations or details. |
Paragraphs were not constructed as well as they
could have been. Paragraphs do contain
related information. |
Paragraph structure was not clear and sentences were
not typically related to each other. |
|
Spelling and Punctuation |
There are no spelling or punctuation errors in the
final copy. |
There is one spelling error or punctuation error in
the final copy. |
There are 2 – 3 spelling and punctuation errors on
the final copy. |
There are 4 or more spelling and punctuation errors
on the final copy. |
|
Accuracy of Facts |
All the topic facts* about
ancient |
One of the topic facts about ancient |
There are 2 topic facts missing from the story or 2
or more inaccuracies. The letter contains 8 accurate facts about the
queen. |
There are more than three factual errors in the
story and/or topic facts missing. There are less than 7 accurate facts about the
queen. |
|
Format |
The letter complies with all the requirements for a letter. |
The letter has all but one of the elements of a
letter. |
The letter is missing two or more elements. |
The letter is missing more than 3 elements. |
* Topic facts are the
required information that accurately reflects the accomplishments, time period,
and victories she achieved.
Compare her role in
society to that of the “common” woman
Please note that this rubric also defines
how well you worked with your peer reviewer and how well you used your time in
the computer lab.
To print this rubric change the page set up
orientation to landscape.
This rubric was created in part by the wonderful
rubric maker found at http://rubistar.4teachers.org/.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|